A major event that takes place in 2014 will plunge the world into a crisis that will characterize the rest of the century, according to Cambridge professor Nicholas Boyle, and only the introduction of global governance can save humanity from an era of poverty and violence.
“A ‘Doomsday’ moment will take place in 2014 – and will determine whether the 21st century is full of violence and poverty or will be peaceful and prosperous, according to a Cambridge University professor,” reports the Daily Mail.
“In the last 500 years there has been a cataclysmic ‘Great Event’ of international significance at the start of each century, he claims. Occurring in the middle of the second decade of each century, they include events which sparked wars, religious conflict and brought peace.”
In order to “fight climate change,” which as the Climategate scandal highlighted, is nothing more than a contrived fraud exaggerated and exploited by the elite in an effort to plunder the taxpayer and impose draconian rules and regulations on our day to day existence, as well as to solve the financial crisis (also a creation of the elite), Boyle states that peace and security can only be guaranteed if an “effective system of global governance is introduced” to replace nation states.
Boyle’s warning that only global governance run by by an enlightened elite can rescue the planet from turmoil is a familiar talking point put out by the establishment to hoodwink people into meekly accepting the end of national sovereignty as an inevitable process, a natural progression that they have no power to stop.
In reality, the move towards global governance is not natural at all, it has come as a consequence of elitists exploiting the crises they create to artificially push the globe towards a centralized and dictatorial political and economic system run by the few to the detriment of the many.
No better can this be illustrated than with the financial crisis, which the elite had foreknowledge of and positioned themselves to exploit in order to propose more regulation and global economic governance as the only solution.
Immediately before the credit crunch,globalist financial firms like Goldman Sachs were secretly betting on a U.S. housing market collapse while telling their clients to buy $40 billion in securities backed by at least 200,000 risky home mortgages. Likewise, central banks knew that a global collapse in the property market would herald the start of the worldwide economic downturn, but deliberately kept such information from the public.
Elitists like Boyle are indoctrinated by the establishment and the academic system into a consensus view that global governance will benefit humanity, when in reality by its very nature it is undemocratic and beneficial only to the tiny group of insiders who hold the reigns of power.
Global government does not represent an improvement on the world being governed by nation states, as Boyle claims, it is merely being promoted for the administrative convenience of an elite who wish to decimate individual freedoms, the democratic process in general, and set themselves up as autocratic overlords perched in their own Tower of Babel ruling over all the serfs below.
Global government is not being developed as some kind of utopian Star-Trek like structure of enlightened and benevolent rule, it is designed to be dictatorial, plutocratic and completely unrepresentative of the people’s interests.
This fact was admitted by one of Boyle’s peers, Financial Times columnist Gideon Rachman, who in a 2008 piece called for a dictatorial global government to be installed to fight terrorism, climate change and solve the financial crisis.
Global government is by no means a new phenomenon proposed as a “solution” to current problems, it is the ultimate goal for a long-standing agenda that seeks to crush national sovereignty and freedom and replace it with a tyrannical new world order.
When international financier James Warburg told a Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1950, “We shall have a world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest,” he obviously wasn’t referring to some touchy-feely world government, he was characterizing it as a dictatorial, dominant force that would crush any opposition to its implementation.
The notion that global governance is both inevitable and a natural political progression for mankind needs to be countered at every turn. The growth of global governance has always been advanced by artificially contrived crises unleashed upon humanity by an arrogant and wicked elite who wish to see prosperity and the middle class destroyed by returning to the dark ages of serfs and peasants.
Paul Joseph Watson