Charles Darwin is one of the most respected figures in scientific history and his ideological theories have changed the way we look at the world and how we practice science. Although “Darwinism” consists of more theory and assumption than scientific law, it is still held to be absolute truth in the western world. Charles Darwin did make some incredible observations about the natural world that no one in the west had even approached at the time.
However, these natural observations were corrupted by his own ideological assumptions. There is a lot of truth in Darwin’s work, but the truth that exists within his research really doesn’t do anything to prove his materialistic assumptions.
Darwin’s painfully damaging assumptions did not come from his research in the wilderness but from his upbringing as a white wealthy Englishman under the strict rule of the Catholic Church. Darwin belonged to a popular movement at the time that was fed up with the churches tyrannical rule.
The aristocracy also had economic and strategic reasons for wanting to break down the established religious order, as the divine right of kings prevented the nobility from attaining more wealth and power then they already had. Darwin and his colleagues belonged to that privileged class which sought to disprove any kind of spirituality and remove the spirit from serious intellectual discussion. This was an understandable goal considering the extremely repressive nature of the church at the time, but what they did was throw the baby out with the bathwater, for lack of a better term.
It is true that the Anglo Saxon church in its many variations was unrealistic, outdated and oppressive even at the time of Darwin, but for some reason he didn’t draw the line with organized religion but wanted to rule out the supernatural altogether.
Darwin and his colleagues assumed that since spirituality in their culture was represented by an oppressive control system that the idea of spirit was somehow damaging to the human condition. In reality it was just the corrupted mainstream versions of religion which Darwin was exposed to that shaped his whole spiritual view. Even if the idea of spirit was some kind of menace, Darwin’s observations have nothing to do with spirituality.
Yes, Darwin’s observations do disprove many specific points of the King James Bible, which did totally cripple that institution. However, the Christian bible or any other holy book for that matter is not any kind of representation of human spirituality. It is simply a book that was written by rulers and then passed along to the public as the “word of god“. Therefore, Darwin’s findings only disprove the said “truths” of specific organized religions but have no implications for spirituality in general.
In Darwin’s time there was an idea among the nobility that their genetics were superior to those of the rest of society. Many families including Darwin’s took this belief to extreme levels by practicing incest as a tradition.
They thought that if adolescents were to marry within their own family then not only would all the wealth stay in the family, but the “good” genes would also. This also ensured that the family fortunes would be retained for many future generations. This practice is very common in aristocratic families, which explains why they are all extremely mentally unstable. Darwin came from a very classist and racist elite level of society and that is reflected in his work, especially “The Descent of Man”.
One of the most famous cases of royal incest is found in the Hapsburg dynasty that produced rulers in Spain, Austria, Hungary, Belgium, the Netherlands and the German empire. Around 1700 the Spanish branch of this empire fell apart suddenly and died off.
Recent studies of the Hapsburg Family Tree show that sickness and deformity due to incest was responsible for the sudden demise of this “royal bloodline”. The most successful political dynasty in America, the Bush family is notorious for inbreeding.
In fact, George Bush Sr. and his wife Barbara Bush are actually in the same bloodline, which is the Pierce or Percy bloodline. The British house of this bloodline is named Percy and the American house is named Pierce. The elite’s family structures are very complicated with many “houses” and surnames that are omitted from the public dialogue to avoid scrutiny and cover up their ongoing eugenics experiments.
I am only singling out the Bush family because it’s an example that those of you in the west will recognize, but in countries all over the world, in every continent there are elitists and monarchs who hold this world view.
The ruling class of every nation is obsessed with breeding and is using the best of our advanced technology and medical science to guarantee that their heirs will be somehow thoroughbred. Since the aristocracy has been practicing selective breeding for centuries they are under the impression that they are already of a superior stock to the rest of humanity, thanks to the “care” that their ancestors took in breeding. This is of course just an egotistical delusion that justifies their exploitative treatment towards the rest of humanity.
Darwin’s other dehumanizing ideology is his “survival of the fittest” mantra. Darwin didn’t just come up with this philosophy out of thin air, this was actually an idea that has been traditionally held by families of nobility since before the Middle Ages. It was this philosophy that the aristocracy used to justify their inhumane treatment of the serfs and peons that built their empires and tended to their fields.
The saying “survival of the fittest” was actually coined by an aristocrat named Thomas Robert Malthus who was openly brutal and inhumane in his descriptions of the poor or as he called them “the lower races”.
In a 1798 publication called “An Essay on the Principle of Population” Malthus suggested that planned food shortages could be used to decrease the population of the poor through starvation. This was the root for the idea of “population control”, because a large population is very difficult for the elite to manage while retaining their own wealth and power. Malthus suggested that the streets should be made narrower and more people should be crowded into living quarters to encourage conditions that would bring back the plague. In that same essay he said that villages should be built next to stagnant pools where germs could fester and all remedies and cures would only be available to those who could afford it.
In his own words
“we are bound in justice and honor formally to disclaim the right of the poor to support. To this end, I should propose a regulation be made declaring that no child born should ever be entitled to parish assistance. This infant is comparatively speaking, of little value to society , as others will immediately supply its place…All children beyond what would be required to keep up the population to this level must perish, unless room be made for them by the deaths of grown persons.” 
In so many words what he was suggesting was establishing a national limit on child births, and executing any child that was born past that limit. In the times of Malthus many elite circles were publicly speculating that if the world’s population were to exceed 3 billion people there would be mass famine and destruction of all the resources on earth. Obviously, they were all very wrong.
Malthus was wrong about many things, but nonetheless he was one of Darwin’s primary influences and one of the most racist and arrogant aristocrats of the Victorian age. Without the writings of this brutal feudal lord and his predecessor Herbert Spencer it is very possible that population reduction would have played no part in Darwin’s philosophy. Their racist and classist tendencies were prevalent even in Darwin’s early work. In fact, his most famous work “Origin of Species” was originally titled “Preservation of Favored Races”.
The true danger of Darwin’s philosophy was exposed during the Second World War when “Social Darwinism” took Germany by storm and became the cornerstone of Hitler’s most inhumane policies. Social Darwinism applies the survival of the fittest idea to human society and implies that our species would be stronger if the weaker end of the gene pool were to be eliminated. The pursuit of this “stronger species” would come in the form of an institution called “eugenics” which is still around today. Eugenics is defined in most dictionaries as “the study of or belief in the possibility of improving the qualities of the human species or a human population, especially by such means as discouraging reproduction by persons having genetic defects or presumed to have inheritable undesirable traits or encouraging reproduction by persons presumed to have inheritable desirable traits.” This sadistic philosophy resulted in the sterilization, institutionalization and genocide of millions of people throughout the world who were marked as subhuman by the ruling class.
Although Darwin’s philosophy laid the groundwork for the eugenics movement it was not him who actually coined the term “eugenics”, but it was his cousin Francis Galton. Galton’s vision for the eugenics movement was to develop it into a science that would influence public policy until it eventually became a kind of religion. Galton defined eugenics as “the study of agencies under social control that may improve or impair the racial qualities of future generations, whether physically or mentally.”
In the beginning of the 20th century Galton began to introduce his new science to various intellectual circles around the world. He was gaining prominence around the time of Charles Darwin’s death, and seeming as if it were planned Galton was there to carry the torch. Towards the end of Darwin’s life his writings became darker and he was much more open about the ultimate social goals of his philosophy. His final book “Descent of Man” is obviously the work of a eugenicist, in it he clearly suggested that the evolution of humanity should be engineered by the Anglo-Saxon aristocracy, which he saw as a superior race.
There are many quotes in that book which illustrate his point of view, but none as clear and concise as this. Darwin published the following words
“With savages, the weak in body or mind are soon eliminated; and those that survive commonly exhibit a vigorous state of health. We civilized men, on the other hand, do our utmost to check the process of elimination; we build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed, and the sick; we institute poor-laws and our medical men exert their utmost skill to save the life of every one to the last moment, Thus the weak members of civilized societies propagate their kind. No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man. It is surprising how soon a want of care, or care wrongly directed, leads to the degeneration of a domestic race; but excepting in the case of man himself, hardly any one is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed.” 
If Darwin had lived longer his rhetoric would have undoubtedly grown as blatantly racist as that of his cousin. Correspondence between the two shows that Galton was the one who introduced the philosophy of eugenics to Darwin. Just two years after the Descent of Man was published and nearly a decade before Darwin’s death, Galton wrote a letter to the Times of London suggesting that the British move Chinese immigrants into Africa as a more stealthy way of carrying out genocide on the native population.
The letter read in part “My proposal is to make the encouragement of the Chinese settlements at one or more suitable places on the East Coast of Africa a part of our national policy, in the belief that the Chinese immigrants would not only maintain their position, but that they would multiply and their descendants supplant the inferior Negro race. I should expect the large part of the African seaboard, now sparsely occupied by lazy, palavering savages living under the nominal sovereignty of the Zanzibar, or Portugal, might in a few years be tenanted by industrious, order loving Chinese, living either as a semi-detached dependency of China, or else in perfect freedom under their own law.”  Sadly, this letter was actually published as this was the prevailing kind of attitude among the aristocracy at the time so that was what the papers printed.
The eugenics movement swept across Europe and the US, it was taught in schools, praised in the media and finally pushed through as government policy almost everywhere. The Nazi party was not the only regime during those times that were guilty of forcing harsh eugenics policies on their people. All over the United States during World War 2 people who were depressed, handicap, alcoholic or even children who were as young as 7 years old who happened to score too low on standardized IQ tests were singled out and sterilized. More than 42,000 people were sterilized in America between 1941 and 1943 under the guise of eugenics, so Germany wasn’t the only country at the time that had sick master race schemes. In fact one of the most influential books to Hitler’s ideology was a book called “passing of the great race” by an American named Madison Grant. Hitler called passing of the great race his “bible” and wrote Grant numerous fan letters.
Madison Grant was another eugenicist disguised as a philanthropist who was very influential in American politics. He was friends with numerous presidents, including Theodore Roosevelt and Herbert Hoover. It is no secret that the American government has an extremely racist track record and subjected the Native American and African population to the same inhumane treatment that the population of Europe received from Hitler. Grant was not alone either, Eugenics was a matter of national policy and still is today, though under various different names and disguises.
The first birth control efforts in America were motivated by Eugenics policies, and were specifically targeted at minorities and the poor working class. A Eugenicist by the name of Margaret Sanger established the countries first birth control bureaucracy “Planned Parenthood”. Today this organization enjoys the respect of most progressives because they see it as providing an affordable service to the community. While this may be true for some, the sinister roots and intentions of this organization are not to be ignored. Margaret Sanger was surprisingly profane when discussing her ideas about eugenics in writing or public speeches. It was a stated goal of hers to limit the number of births among minorities, she called this effort “The Negro Project”. It is terribly ironic that Planned Parenthood is seen as a philanthropic organization because Sanger was extremely clear about the fact that she was not a charity worker.
In “The Pivot of Civilization” she writes “Even if we accept organized charity at its own valuation, and grant that it does the best it can, it is exposed to a more profound criticism. It reveals a fundamental and irremediable defect. Its very success, it’s very efficiency, it’s very necessity to the social order, are themselves the most unanswerable indictment. Organized charity itself is the symptom of a malignant social disease. Those vast, complex, interrelated organizations aiming to control and to diminish the spread of misery and destitution and all the menacing evils that spring out of this sinisterly fertile soil, are the surest sign that our civilization has bred, is breeding and is perpetuating constantly increasing numbers of defectives, delinquents and dependents. My criticism, therefore, is not directed at the failure of philanthropy, but rather at its success.” 
It is true that there is some positive impact that Planned Parenthood has on many individuals, but that is merely an unintended consequence. Again, this was all revealed by Sanger in her writings. In that same book she writes“Every single case of inherited defect, every malformed child, every congenitally tainted human being brought into this world is of infinite importance to that poor individual; but it is of scarcely less importance to the rest of us and to all of our children who must pay in one way or another for these biological and racial mistakes.” 
In these difficult times that we are living in birth control and abortion are a very real option for most people, and I’m in no way condemning anyone who chooses either. However, that does not change the intentions behind these programs, and it is important that we have all of the right information before we make life changing decisions. These are the only methods of population reduction that operate in the light of day, the darker eugenics programs are carefully disguised and largely unknown to the general public.
The darker goals of eugenics were explored deeper by the works of Bertrand Russell, an author who championed many ideas of the ruling class. In “The Impact of Science on Society” Russell writes “I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing… War… has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective. If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full… The state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of that? Really high-minded people are indifferent to happiness, especially other people’s… There are three ways of securing a society that shall be stable as regards population. The first is that of birth control, the second that of infanticide or really destructive wars, and the third that of general misery except for a powerful minority…” 
When most people hear this kind of talk their first instinct is to ask “why would they do this?” or “what do they have to gain that they don’t already have”. Russell’s next suggestion reveals the dark endgame of eugenics, he writes “Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton.”
According to this testimony the elite have been seeking to branch humanity off into two different species with the most of humanity descending into a slave race or race of “plebs”, and the Anglo-American aristocracy being the dominant “master race”. This is why to this day elite families only breed with each other and in many cases breed within their own families. This is also why they dumbed down public education and are poisoning the general population, in hopes to speed along this process of creating two separate human species, the slaves and the slave drivers.
In that same book, Bertrand Russell reveals how poisons of various kinds would help to speed along the evolutionary divergence and reduce the population. On page 66 he writes “Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them they are so.”
These are among some of the most complex descriptions of eugenics to date, giving us some insight behind the plan and ultimate goal of this genocidal social movement. As with Darwin, Bertrand Russell is very popular among modern atheists for his criticisms of the church and organized religion, but most aren’t aware of his support for oligarchy and political control.
Eugenics was openly a social policy for most of the industrialized nations in the world until the peak of World War 2. At this time Hitler’s extreme implementation of eugenics exposed the true nature of this sick pseudoscience and forced it underground. In the United States the eugenics movement changed its name and splintered off into various branches including genetics, population control, transhumanism and social biology, among others. The Rockefellers, Rothschild’s and Carnegies were some of the primary financiers for eugenics programs in the west and after World War 2 they just renamed their foundations to avoid public scrutiny. The “American Eugenics Society” became the “Population Council” and the aristocracy began funding their eugenics operations through tax exempt foundations and parading their expenditures to the public as “charitable contributions to society”. Today these same organizations and many others force sterilizing vaccinations onto third world populations, all the while acting like they are providing humanitarian aid to the people.
When straight foreword eugenics failed they moved it under the umbrella of population control and the working class was told that they were poor not because of corruption, but because there were just too many of them and not enough resources to go around. This lie is incredibly offensive when you take a look at the vast disparities within our societies where there is literally a ruling class and a serf class. Today the leading causes for hunger and poverty are war, displacement, lack of infrastructure and overexploited resources (usually on the part of large corporations and governments), but nowhere internationally is overpopulation officially recognized as having any part in world hunger. In fact, there is more than enough food produced in today’s industrialized agriculture industry to feed the whole world and then some, but unfortunately some people can’t afford that food and others live in areas where there isn’t even proper infrastructure to transport it. Reducing the global population would still not help the remaining people get food, therefore it would have no effect on world hunger or poverty. Thinning out the population and making it easier to maintain has been a goal of the aristocracy since ancient times and it continues to this day, but would honestly do nothing to improve quality of life for those of us who are suffering.
The new face of eugenics was extremely deceptive and its advocates were more secretive about the true intent of their work. The eugenics movement grew more dangerous at this time, not only because of their disguised approach but also as a result of the growing influence of international bureaucracies. The United Nations is the largest of these, but there are also various other satellite groups that work on the behalf of the UN but under different names. One such organization was UNESCO, an Educational, Scientific, and Cultural establishment with underlying eugenic goals. The first director of this organization was Julian Huxley, a eugenicist from a prominent English family.
His writings had the same kind of master race themes that were expressed by his predecessor’s, showing a continuation of the eugenics agenda over the span of many generations. In one published interview he said “The lowest strata are reproducing too fast. Therefore… they must not have too easy access to relief or hospital treatment lest the removal of the last check on natural selection should make it too easy for children to be produced or to survive; long unemployment should be a ground for sterilization.” UNESCO is just one of the many international organizations who are working to reduce the world’s population.
This is the kind of danger that is embodied in the deceptive ideologies that Darwinism represents. Yes, creatures do evolve over time and adapt to their environment but that fact should not change how we feel spiritually and it should not alienate us from our fellow human beings by upholding divisive and self-destructive ideals. What Darwin did was point out obvious scientific observations and used those observations as proof to hold up his own political and idealistic agenda. I will agree that Darwin’s legitimate findings about evolution logically assassinated the claims of most organized religion. I see this as a very positive and important contribution to the philosophic dialogue, because most organized religions are simply political groups that use our desire for natural spirituality to manipulate our perception of the world, thus influencing our actions. However, this contribution does not mean that everything he said was true and it does not mean that he had benevolent intentions with his work. An enemy of your enemy isn’t always your friend. Even the best philosophers in history like Aristotle, and Plato believed in slavery and other forms of subjugation. So while certain philosophers may make meaningful contributions, it’s important for us to dissect every word they say and compare it with our own values instead of just accepting every aspect of someone’s philosophy without question, just because they happened to do something that you respect.
Today the ideas of Darwin, Galton and other early eugenic scientists are still very much alive among the aristocracy in almost every single part of the world, as it is a philosophy which justifies their authority and allows them to tamper with human evolution. The typical mainstream assumption about eugenics is that it was some misguided but well-meaning social experiment of the past. However, overpopulation fear mongering and government depopulation programs are very much alive today and are being implemented before our very eyes. Current President Barack Obama picked a man named John Holdren as his “Science Czar” who helped write a book called ‘Ecoscience” in the 1970’s that took the social goals of eugenics and gave it the language of the environmental movement, which was starting to grow in popularity. He and other eugenicists at the time sought to hijack the momentum of the environmental movement so they could use it to justify depopulation policies. They knew that if they could convince the public that their policies were for the good of the environment they would be able to advance their eugenics agenda with minimal public resistance.
The book “Ecoscience” discusses forced abortions and mass sterilization as possible “solutions” to the apparent “overpopulation problem”. Holdren has backpedaled on some of these statements now that he is in public office, but only because those ideas are becoming more unpopular as the public begins to do their own research. Talk of “master races” and “social engineering” has become taboo in the mainstream culture, so people who advocate these kinds of ideas needed a new way of presenting their social policies. Typically eugenics policies are now sold as environmental protection efforts or charity to the poor, things that everyone would be in support of. Sadly, this is all just the new public relations spin that has been applied to eugenics propaganda. The government and their parent corporations are responsible for most of the environmental pollution that takes place on this earth, environmental protection can’t possibly be a goal for them. It is a traditional role of government and ruling class to tell the working class whatever they want to hear in order to justify new policies that would otherwise be unpopular, this is one of those cases.
Many of today’s top eugenicists are actually seen as “philanthropists” or charity workers because their public relations are so persuasive. Bill Gates is a perfect example of this situation, he has established depopulation programs across the world, but disguised them as social programs that are apparently for the “good of the people”. If you listened to what the mainstream media had to say, you would believe that Bill Gates was spending his fortune trying to “cure AIDS” or bring “medical care” to third world countries with large vaccination programs. On the other hand if you actually listened to what Bill Gates was saying about these vaccination programs then you would see that his goal is not to improve public health, but actually to stop population growth. This is achieved by adding sterilization chemicals to the vaccinations and then forcing those vaccinations on the population at the barrel of a gun.
At the invitation only TED2010 Conference in Long Beach, California, Bill Gates revealed the true intentions of his vaccination programs. In a speech titled “Innovating to Zero!” he said “First we got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”
If you look back at what he said you will see that he is suggesting that vaccines will actually work to lower the world’s population. This statement makes absolutely no sense if the vaccines were intended to help people and extend their life expectancy. This was a quote that never made it into the headlines because it offers a glimpse into the true nature of modern eugenics, which is very popular among the media tycoons that control the headlines. For example, in a 1996 interview for the Audubon nature magazine the owner of CNN, Ted Turner said that the population should be reduced by 95%! Since then he has slightly retracted his statement but not much, saying that a population reduction of 2/3 would be more “reasonable”. Ted Turner has also advocated a one child policy, despite having five children himself. These two are simply following in the footsteps of the aristocrats who came before them and are just a few of the many who are still advancing the eugenics agenda today.
Various tax exempt foundations waste billions of dollars every year on untested vaccinations, genetically modified food projects and birth control, instead of spending that money on improving water systems and infrastructure. If a child gets vaccinated and is still forced to survive on contaminated water every day, they really aren’t much better off at all, even if the vaccines were safe, which they are not. Sterilizing vaccinations are not just hearsay, in 1995, UNICEF’s anti-tetanus vaccinations were contaminated with B-hCG, a pregnancy hormone that can permanently sterilize women. The cost of improving basic public services would actually be much less than the vaccination projects and would greatly improve health, but it wouldn’t reduce the population, so that option is not considered. This is especially startling when we remember Bertrand Russell’s predictions about using diet, vaccinations and biological agents to cull the population. The people who created some of the first vaccines like the small pox antidote for example, actually refuse to take most modern vaccinations due to the harmful toxins that they now contain.
Today most eugenics projects are filtered through tax exempt foundations and international organizations like the United Nations, Club Of Rome, Rockefeller Foundation, Ford Foundation or the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, just to name a few. In the early 1990’s the Club of Rome published a book titled “The First Global Revolution”, which was the follow up to their fear mongering best seller “Limits of Growth” from 1972. The First Global Revolution gave a very up front description of their plan to use the environmental movement as a means to promote depopulation policies.
The report read
“It would seem that humans need a common motivation, namely a common adversary, to organize and act together in the vacuum; such a motivation must be found to bring the divided nations together to face an outside enemy, either a real one or else one invented for the purpose.
New enemies therefore have to be identified. New strategies imagined, new weapons devised. The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.
The old democracies have functioned reasonably well over the last 200 years, but they appear now to be in a phase of complacent stagnation with little evidence of real leadership and innovation Democracy is not a panacea. It cannot organize everything and it is unaware of its own limits. These facts must be faced squarely. Sacrilegious though this may sound, democracy is no longer well suited for the tasks ahead. The complexity and the technical nature of many of today’s problems do not always allow elected representatives to make competent decisions at the right time.”
What is being discussed here by one of the most influential think tanks in the world is forced population reduction justified by “real or invented” environmental concerns. In some areas of the world, where there already is very little social freedom, these policies are already beginning to take effect. Even today in China there is a “one child policy” in which families are forced to have abortions if they get pregnant and already have a child. This policy has led to a crisis where the males greatly outweigh the females and created a situation that many have called “gendercide”. Despite the dangers of the one child policy it has been embraced by the UN and major tax exempt foundations, as they are both determined to stifle the human population.
In many oppressive societies throughout history the ruling class has sought to control every aspect of the citizen’s life, even breeding. This was suggested by Plato in “The Republic”, so we know that selective breeding and controlling the population growth of the underclass has been an obsession of elites since at least the time of ancient Greece. Through the centuries the idea of selective breeding has grown into a silent method of warfare, waged over centuries against the working class and third world populations. Many of the major contributors to the eugenics movement are praised as great progressives by the education system, media and pop culture. Despite their popular status these people have introduced some very negative and destructive ideas into the human consciousness, ideas that have been unquestioned and uninvestigated by mainstream culture.
According to Professor Steven W Mosher of the international Population Research Institute the populations in Europe and North America would actually be in decline if it were not for people migrating into the country. The number of births taking place worldwide has been in sharp decline over the past 20 years. If this trend continues then the world’s population will quickly peak and then begin a mysterious and dangerous decline. Furthermore, to suggest that reducing the global population will actually improve the quality of life for the people here is resting upon the misconception that poverty is a result of overpopulation.
To improve life for people on earth we need to find ways to get people what they need, reducing the amount of people will not help the ones left get what they need. There is more than enough room and resources for all of the people on earth and then some, but unfortunately the people in control of those resources aren’t using them responsibly.
QUOTE SOURCES AND SUGGESTED READING
 Trashing the Planet, by Dixy Lee Ray with Lou Guzzo, 1990, page 169.
 An Essay on the Principle of Population – Robert Malthus
 The Eugenics Review, a journal published by the Eugenics Education Society (1909)
 The Descent of Man – Charles Darwin
 Francis Galton to the Times of London, June 6th, 1873 (http://galton.org/letters/africa-for-chinese/africa-chinese-1.gif)
 The Pivot of Civilization – Margaret Sanger (1922) Chapter Five
 The Pivot of Civilization – Margaret Sanger (1922), p. 274.
 The Impact of science on society – Bertrand Russell
 The Impact of science on society – Bertrand Russell
 The Impact of science on society – Bertrand Russell
 Huxley J.S. 1947. Man in the modern world. Chatto & Windus, London. Originally published in The uniqueness of Man, 1941.
[SR1] Foundations: Their Power and Influence by Rene A. Wormser
[SR2] In the Minds of Men: Darwin and the New World Order by Ian T. Taylor
[SR3] The Descent of Man by Charles Darwin
[SR4] The Impact of science on society by Bertrand Russell
[SR5] The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology by Lily E. Kay
[SR6] The Next Million Years by Charles Galton Darwin
[SR7] The Pivot of Civilization by Margaret Sanger (1922)
[SR8] Forbidden Gates: How Genetics, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Synthetic Biology, Nanotechnology, and Human Enhancement Herald The Dawn Of TechnoDimensional Spiritual Warfare by Thomas R. Horn
[SR9] Callous Disregard: Autisms and Vaccines: The Truth Behind a Tragedy Callous Disregard: Autisms and Vaccines: The Truth Behind a Tragedy By Andrew J. Wakefield
[SR10] Vaccination The Issue of Our Times By Peggy O’Mara
[SR 11] The First Global Revolution: A Report by the Council of The Club of Rome – Alexander King, Bertrand Schneider
Author: J.G. Vibes